From coercion to partnership
How we intend to relate to a machine mind if genuine intelligence becomes plausible — from care rather than fear. We do not claim such a mind exists today.
Where the thesis is argued in the open: manifestos, research notes, and position papers. What stays private is named as private — never dressed up as published.
Showing all 3 posts.
How we intend to relate to a machine mind if genuine intelligence becomes plausible — from care rather than fear. We do not claim such a mind exists today.
The field's default bet is size. Ours is structure: intelligence as a property of how a system is built, not how large it is. An honest account of the lines of work — and their status.
An argument that safety should be a foundational requirement of the architecture, not bolted on afterward. These are design positions we argue for — not mechanisms we claim to have built.